英语翻译SampleChief administrators of 198 Texas hospitals wereasked to include their hospitals in this study.One-hundred and six of the contacted administratorsagreed to help.The high participation rateof 54 percent is probably attributable to th

英语翻译SampleChief administrators of 198 Texas hospitals wereasked to include their hospitals in this study.One-hundred and six of the contacted administratorsagreed to help.The high participation rateof 54 percent is probably attributable to th
英语翻译
Sample
Chief administrators of 198 Texas hospitals were
asked to include their hospitals in this study.
One-hundred and six of the contacted administrators
agreed to help.The high participation rate
of 54 percent is probably attributable to the participation
request being made on the letterhead
of a university with high status in the state of
Texas.The 198 Texas hospitals were randomly
selected from a list of hospitals published by the
American Hospital Association.
Data and measures
Data were collected from chief administrators
through a four-page questionnaire.The measures
used in this study were slightly modified versions
of the measures used in Study 1.Modifications
were made to focus the measures on the hospital
sector.Also,the turbulence measure was
expanded from four to eight items,and 5-point
scales rather than 7-point scales were used for
comprehensiveness,cognitive diversity,and turbulence.
Results
Interitem reliability estimates,means,standard
deviations,and correlations among the variables
are presented in Table 3.The reliability estimates range from acceptable (0.65) to excellent (0.90),
with an average of 0.83.
In the first set of regression analyses,comprehensiveness
was regressed onto cognitive diversity,
turbulence,and size.As shown in Table 4,
the results suggest that cognitive diversity has
little impact on comprehensiveness.This finding
is counter to our earlier finding,and may be the
result of industry differences; i.e.,it may be that
diversity has important effects in business firms
but not in hospitals.In hospitals,it may be the
case that variables such as private vs.government
ownership,contribution of federal reimbursement
programs,and urban vs.rural setting are much
more important determinants of comprehensiveness
than is cognitive diversity.A second
possibility is that sampling error in the population
of hospitals led to the insignificant results in this
particular study.
In the second set of regression analyses,extensiveness
was regressed onto cognitive diversity and the control variables.Consistent with Study
1,the results suggest that overall cognitive diversity
has a negative effect on extensiveness
(p ,0.05,see Table 4).Also consistent with
Study 1,the results suggest that preference diversity
has important effects while belief diversity
does not (see Table 4).
这是一篇经济论文的一部分～

英语翻译SampleChief administrators of 198 Texas hospitals wereasked to include their hospitals in this study.One-hundred and six of the contacted administratorsagreed to help.The high participation rateof 54 percent is probably attributable to th
样品
德克萨斯州的198医院行政管理员
要求在该项研究的医院.
一一百零六个联系管理员
同意帮助.参与率高
百分之54可能是由于参与
要求正在对信笺
在一个国家的崇高地位的大学
德克萨斯州.德克萨斯州的198医院,随机
选自一所医院名单公布
美国医院协会.
数据和措施
资料由行政管理员
通过一个4页的调查表.这些措施
在这项研究中所用的版本略作修改
在研究1中使用的措施.修改
提出了把重点放在医院的措施
部门.此外,动荡措施是
由4名增至8项,5点
而不是7级分表被用于
综合性,认知多样性和动荡.
结果
Interitem可靠性的估计,方式,标准
偏差,变量之间的相关性
列于表3.可靠性估计可以接受（0.65）卓越的范围（0.90）,
一个平均的0.83.
在回归分析,第一套全面性
是回归到认知的多样性,
动荡和大小.如表4所示,
结果表明,认知的多样性
几乎没有影响的全面性.这一发现
是与我们早先的调查结果,并可能成为
行业差异的结果,也就是说,它可能是
多样性在商业企业的重要作用
但不是在医院.在医院,这可能是
案件的变量,如私人与政府
所有权,联邦偿还贡献
计划,以及城市和农村环境远
综合性的重要因素
比认知的多样性.第二
可能是,抽样误差在人口
对导致这一结果的微不足道医院
特别研究.
在回归分析,第二组广泛性
是回归到认知的多样性和控制变量.符合研究
1,结果表明,整体认知多样性
有负面影响的广泛性
性（P,0.05,见表4）.也符合
1研究,结果表明,偏好多样性
有重要的影响,同时信仰的多样性
不（见表4）.

Sample
Chief administrators of 198 Texas hospitals were
asked to include their hospitals in this study.
One-hundred and six of the contacted administrators
agreed to help. The high par...

全部展开

Sample
Chief administrators of 198 Texas hospitals were
asked to include their hospitals in this study.
One-hundred and six of the contacted administrators
agreed to help. The high participation rate
of 54 percent is probably attributable to the participation
request being made on the letterhead
of a university with high status in the state of
Texas. The 198 Texas hospitals were randomly
selected from a list of hospitals published by the
American Hospital Association.
Data and measures
Data were collected from chief administrators
through a four-page questionnaire. The measures
used in this study were slightly modified versions
of the measures used in Study 1. Modifications
were made to focus the measures on the hospital
sector. Also, the turbulence measure was
expanded from four to eight items, and 5-point
scales rather than 7-point scales were used for
comprehensiveness, cognitive diversity, and turbulence.
Results
Interitem reliability estimates, means, standard
deviations, and correlations among the variables
are presented in Table 3. The reliability estimates range from acceptable (0.65) to excellent (0.90),
with an average of 0.83.
In the first set of regression analyses, comprehensiveness
was regressed onto cognitive diversity,
turbulence, and size. As shown in Table 4,
the results suggest that cognitive diversity has
little impact on comprehensiveness. This finding
is counter to our earlier finding, and may be the
result of industry differences; i.e., it may be that
diversity has important effects in business firms
but not in hospitals. In hospitals, it may be the
case that variables such as private vs. government
ownership, contribution of federal reimbursement
programs, and urban vs. rural setting are much
more important determinants of comprehensiveness
than is cognitive diversity. A second
possibility is that sampling error in the population
of hospitals led to the insignificant results in this
particular study.
In the second set of regression analyses, extensiveness
was regressed onto cognitive diversity and the control variables. Consistent with Study
1, the results suggest that overall cognitive diversity
has a negative effect on extensiveness
(p , 0.05, see Table 4). Also consistent with
Study 1, the results suggest that preference diversity
has important effects while belief diversity
does not (see Table 4).
样品
行政长官的德克萨斯医院是1980
要求包括医院在本研究中。
六百年的联系和行政管理人员
答应帮忙。高参与率
可能是由于对54%的参与
要求作的信笺
一个大学的社会地位高的状态
德克萨斯州。198德克萨斯医院进行随机的
从列表中选择公布的医院
美国医院协会。
数据和措施
数据采集首席行政管理人员
如果通过问卷调查。这个措施,
本研究以问卷调查法用于轻微的修改版本
在研究中使用的措施。修改
这个措施是集中在医院里
部门。同时,湍流的措施
从4到8个项目,并5-point
7-point秤秤,而不是被用来
全面性、认知的多样性和动荡。
结果
Interitem可靠性估计、手段、标准
偏差,和相关性的变量
见表3。在可靠性估计范围从接受0.65)(优秀0.90),
平均为0.83)。
在第一组回归分析、全面性
是倒退到认知多样,
动荡,大小。表4所示,
试验结果表明:认知的多样化
对综合性。这一发现
是我们的更早的发现,可能吗
不同的产业;也就是说,它可能是
多元化经营的公司中有着重要的作用
但是不是在医院。在医院里,它可能是
情况vs.变量如私有
联邦政府的还款,贡献
计划、城市vs.农村环境是多少
更重要的是决定多样化的
认知多样性比。
第二个
可能性是抽样误差
医院导致微不足道的结果
特定的研究。
在第二盘的回归分析、广泛性
是倒退到认知多样性和控制变量。符合研究
1,结果表明总体认知的多样性
具有负面影响广度
(p,0.05,见表4)。也符合
研究结果显示,偏爱的多样性
有重要的影响而信仰多样性
没有(见表4)。

收起